Prediction of Paul Capdeville vs Zack Fleishman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Capdeville vs Z. Fleishman

Paul Capdeville

CHI

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

127

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$467.5K

Career Money

$100.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Zack Fleishman

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

127

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$467.5K

Career Money

$100.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Capdeville 1 - 1 Fleishman

They have played 4 sets in total, with Paul Capdeville winning 2 and Zack Fleishman winning 2. The last match between Paul Capdeville and Zack Fleishman was at the The Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas, 25-02-2007, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Paul Capdeville getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Capdeville	1
Fleishman	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q2) The Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas(02-25-07)

Stats

Paul Capdeville

Zack Fleishman

(R1) USTA Challenger - Champaign(11-13-06)

Stats

Zack Fleishman

Paul Capdeville

P. Capdeville vs Z. Fleishman H2H Profile

P. Capdeville	Stats	Z. Fleishman
$467,483	Career Prize Money	$100,345
56.47% (393-303)	Career Total W/L	51.99% (222-205)
1	Hard	0
0	Indoor	1
10	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Capdeville vs Z. Fleishman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Capdeville has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Capdeville, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Capdeville has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zack Fleishman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Capdeville has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Zack Fleishman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Capdeville has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 137/95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/15). Zack Fleishman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 14/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 21/25).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Capdeville has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Zack Fleishman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paul Capdeville winning 1 times and Zack Fleishman being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Paul Capdeville winning 2 and Zack Fleishman winning 2.
The last match between Paul Capdeville and Zack Fleishman was at the The Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas, 25-02-2007, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Paul Capdeville getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Capdeville has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Zack Fleishman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Capdeville has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zack Fleishman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Capdeville has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zack Fleishman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Capdeville vs Zack Fleishman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Capdeville vs Z. Fleishman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Capdeville	Stats	Z. Fleishman
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
14	Games Won	17
9	Aces (Total)	7
1	Total Double Faults	1
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
62% (33/53)	1st Serve %	52% (30/58)
85% (28/33)	1st Serve Win %	60% (18/30)
50% (10/20)	2nd Serve Win %	68% (19/28)
60% (3/5)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/2)
36% (21/58)	Return Points Win %	28% (15/53)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Capdeville Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Santiago Challenger - 14-04-2014
R2 James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-7(5) 6-3 6-4	Stats
R1 Guillermo NunezG. Nunez	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Barranquilla Challenger - 24-03-2014
R1 Adrian UngurA. Ungur	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Panama City Challenger - 17-03-2014
R1 Guido AndreozziG. Andreozzi	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Australian Open - Melbourne - 13-01-2014
Q2 Taro DanielT. Daniel	L	6-0 6-4	Stats

View All

Z. Fleishman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 29-08-2011
Q1 Vincent MillotV. Millot	L	4-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Rogers Cup - Montreal - 08-08-2011
Q1 Alejandro FallaA. Falla	L	6-7(2) 6-2 6-2	Stats
Farmers Classic - Los Angeles - 25-07-2011
Q1 Sahr Timothy KpulunS. Timothy	L	6-2 3-1 ret.	Stats
Wimbledon - London - 20-06-2011
Q1 Marc GicquelM. Gicquel	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 31-08-2009
Q1 Mikhail KukushkinM. Kukushkin	L	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Capdeville vs Z. Fleishman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Capdeville	Stats	Z. Fleishman
56.47% (393/303)	YTD Win/Loss	51.99% (222/205)
54.91% (923/758)	Sets Win/Loss	50.89% (513/495)
51.68% (8157/7627)	Games Win/Loss	50.47% (4898/4807)
59.05% (137/95)	Hard Win/Loss	52.61% (151/136)
57.28% (236/176)	Clay Win/Loss	45.65% (21/25)
43.33% (13/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	51.43% (36/34)
31.82% (7/15)	Grass Win/Loss	58.33% (14/10)
0.18	Aces Per Game	0.04
1354	Aces Total	209
0.13	Double Faults Per Game	0.03
979	Total Double Faults	136
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
600.59	Average Opponent Rank	486.66
61% (15950/26099)	1st Serve %	54% (1576/2919)
68% (10875/15950)	1st Serve Win %	69% (1092/1576)
49% (4995/10154)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (662/1343)
42% (1090/2614)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (91/214)
40% (10444/26327)	Return Points Win %	36% (998/2795)
55.56% (40/32)	Slam W/L	43.59% (17/22)
50.00% (18/18)	Masters W/L	28.57% (2/5)
47.83% (11/12)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
48.94% (69/72)	Main Tour W/L	53.16% (42/37)
59.80% (244/164)	Challenger W/L	51.36% (132/125)
68.75% (11/5)	Futures W/L	64.44% (29/16)
58% (374/648)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (214/413)
38% (15/39)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (4/8)
48% (101/210)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	49% (81/166)
52% (126/243)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (80/149)
83% (394/327)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (216/183)
17% (394/67)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (216/32)
22% (301/65)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (210/37)